Impact of Cloud-Base Turbulence on CCN Activation: Single-Size CCN
This paper examines the impact of cloud-base turbulence on activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Following our previous studies, we contrast activation within a nonturbulent adiabatic parcel and an adiabatic parcel filled with turbulence. The latter is simulated by applying a forced implici...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the atmospheric sciences 2022-02, Vol.79 (2), p.551-566 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper examines the impact of cloud-base turbulence on activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Following our previous studies, we contrast activation within a nonturbulent adiabatic parcel and an adiabatic parcel filled with turbulence. The latter is simulated by applying a forced implicit large-eddy simulation within a triply periodic computational domain of 64
3
m
3
. We consider two monodisperse CCN. Small CCN have a dry radius of 0.01
μ
m and a corresponding activation (critical) radius and critical supersaturation of 0.6
μ
m and 1.3%, respectively. Large CCN have a dry radius of 0.2
μ
m and feature activation radius of 5.4
μ
m and critical supersaturation 0.15%. CCN are assumed in 200-cm
−3
concentration in all cases. Mean cloud-base updraft velocities of 0.33, 1, and 3 m s
−1
are considered. In the nonturbulent parcel, all CCN are activated and lead to a monodisperse droplet size distribution above the cloud base, with practically the same droplet size in all simulations. In contrast, turbulence can lead to activation of only a fraction of all CCN with a nonzero spectral width above the cloud base, of the order of 1
μ
m, especially in the case of small CCN and weak mean cloud-base ascent. We compare our results to studies of the turbulent single-size CCN activation in the Pi chamber. Sensitivity simulations that apply a smaller turbulence intensity, smaller computational domain, and modified initial conditions document the impact of specific modeling assumptions. The simulations call for a more realistic high-resolution modeling of turbulent cloud-base activation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4928 1520-0469 |
DOI: | 10.1175/JAS-D-21-0184.1 |