Structural and Spectroscopic Comparison of Soft‐Se vs. Hard‐O Donor Bonding in Trivalent Americium/Neodymium Molecules

Covalency is often considered to be an influential factor in driving An3+ vs. Ln3+ selectivity invoked by soft donor ligands. This is intensely debated, particularly the extent to which An3+/Ln3+ covalency differences prevail and manifest as the f‐block is traversed, and the effects of periodic breaks beyond Pu. Herein, two Am complexes, [Am{N(E=PPh2)2}3] (1‐Am, E=Se; 2‐Am, E=O) are compared to isoradial [Nd{N(E=PPh2)2}3] (1‐Nd, 2‐Nd) complexes. Covalent contributions are assessed and compared to U/La and Pu/Ce analogues. Through ab initio calculations grounded in UV‐vis‐NIR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray structures, we observe differences in f orbital involvement between Am–Se and Nd–Se bonds, which are not present in O‐donor congeners. Two Am complexes, [Am{N(E=PPh2)2}3] (1‐Am, E=Se; 2‐Am, E=O) are compared to isoradial [Nd{N(E=PPh2)2}3] (1‐Nd, 2‐Nd) complexes. Covalent contributions are assessed and compared to U/La and Pu/Ce analogues. Through ab initio calculations grounded in UV‐vis‐NIR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray structures, we observe differences in f‐orbital involvement between Am–Se and Nd–Se bonds, which are not present in O‐donor congeners.