Validation of numerical models for seismic fluid-structure-interaction analysis of nuclear, safety-related equipment
•Seismic FSI numerical models of a vessel, validated using experimental data.•Dataset generated using earthquake-simulator tests.•Responses critical to advanced reactors considered: pressure, reactions, wave height.•The ALE and ICFD solvers in LS-DYNA for seismic FSI analysis.•Recommendations for va...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear engineering and design 2021-08, Vol.379, p.111179, Article 111179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Seismic FSI numerical models of a vessel, validated using experimental data.•Dataset generated using earthquake-simulator tests.•Responses critical to advanced reactors considered: pressure, reactions, wave height.•The ALE and ICFD solvers in LS-DYNA for seismic FSI analysis.•Recommendations for validation of seismic FSI numerical models.
Seismic design, qualification, and risk assessment of nuclear safety-related vessels filled with liquid will have to consider the interaction between the vessel (tank), the contained liquid, and submerged components, if any. Seismic fluid-structure-interaction (FSI) analysis of nuclear vessels will rely on numerical models, which are required to be verified and validated. This study validates previously-verified numerical models using test data generated from earthquake-simulator experiments involving a cylindrical tank. Two solvers in LS-DYNA for FSI simulations are used for the numerical analysis: Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) and Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICFD). Numerical and test results are compared for responses critical to seismic design of advanced reactor vessels: hydrodynamic pressures on the tank wall, reactions at the support, and wave heights of the contained liquid. Analysis is performed for one-, two-, and three-directional seismic inputs with a range of intensity, and rocking motions. The accuracy of the numerical results and different methods for outputting wave heights are discussed. Recommendations for validation of seismic FSI numerical models of advanced reactors are provided. The validation exercise presented in this study is broadly applicable to cylindrical tanks, regardless of industry sector. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0029-5493 1872-759X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111179 |