A comparison of high voltage outgassing of LiCoO2, LiNiO2, and Li2MnO3 layered Li-ion cathode materials

[Display omitted] One method of increasing the energy density of Li-ion batteries is to access reversible Li intercalation in conventional layered transition metal oxide cathode materials at high potentials (4.3–5 V vs. Li/Li+), and thus allow more electrochemical capacity per volume of active mater...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electrochimica acta 2021-02, Vol.368 (C), p.137505, Article 137505
Hauptverfasser: Papp, Joseph K., Li, Ning, Kaufman, Lori A., Naylor, Andrew J., Younesi, Reza, Tong, Wei, McCloskey, Bryan D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] One method of increasing the energy density of Li-ion batteries is to access reversible Li intercalation in conventional layered transition metal oxide cathode materials at high potentials (4.3–5 V vs. Li/Li+), and thus allow more electrochemical capacity per volume of active material. This comes at the cost of increased interfacial reactivity and often results in capacity fade over many cycles. Tracing gas evolution during electrochemical lithium extraction and insertion provides a useful strategy to understand this high voltage reactivity. In this study, we examine outgassing during Li extraction in well-known layered oxides (LiCoO2, LCO; LiNiO2, LNO; and Li2MnO3, LMO). We highlight key differences in the outgassing of each material. Whereas negligible O2 release is found in LCO and LNO, even with voltage holds at 5 V vs. Li/Li+, O2 release is found to account for a large portion of the electrochemical capacity and persists over many cycles in LMO. CO2 outgassing is observed to varying extents, following the trend of LMO ≈  LNO > LCO, and is due to a combination of residual solid carbonate oxidation and electrolyte degradation. Taken together, these results show the importance of quantitative analysis in understanding the role of transition metal composition on the chemistry of conventional Li-ion battery materials.
ISSN:0013-4686
1873-3859
1873-3859
DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137505