Measurements of the Thermal Resistivity of InAlAs, InGaAs, and InAlAs/InGaAs Superlattices
Thermal management efforts in nanoscale devices must consider both the thermal properties of the constituent materials and the interfaces connecting them. It is currently unclear whether alloy/alloy semiconductor superlattices such as InAlAs/InGaAs have lower thermal conductivities than their consti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ACS applied materials & interfaces 2019-03, Vol.11 (12), p.11970-11975 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Thermal management efforts in nanoscale devices must consider both the thermal properties of the constituent materials and the interfaces connecting them. It is currently unclear whether alloy/alloy semiconductor superlattices such as InAlAs/InGaAs have lower thermal conductivities than their constituent alloys. We report measurements of the crossplane thermal resistivity of InAlAs/InGaAs superlattices at room temperature, showing that the superlattice resistivities are larger by a factor of 1.2–1.6 than that of the constituent bulk materials, depending on the strain state and composition. We show that the additional resistance present in these superlattices can be tuned by a factor of 2.5 by altering the lattice mismatch and thereby the phonon-mode mismatch at the interfaces, a principle that is commonly assumed for superlattices but has not been experimentally verified without adding new elements to the layers. We find that the additional resistance in superlattices does not increase significantly when the layer thickness is decreased from 4 to 2 nm. We also report measurements of 250–1000 nm thick films of undoped InGaAs and InAlAs lattice-matched to InP substrates, for there is no published thermal conductivity value for the latter, and we find it to be 2.24 ± 0.09 at 22 °C, which is ∼2.7 times smaller than the widely used estimates. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1944-8244 1944-8252 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acsami.8b17268 |