Experimental and numerical investigation of the Advanced Fuel Ignition Delay Analyzer (AFIDA) constant-volume combustion chamber as a research platform for fuel chemical kinetic mechanism validation
•Constant volume combustion chamber performs fuel ignition delay measurements.•Developed CFD model accounts for physical mixing and chemical kinetic process effects.•Conditions identified where sufficient mixing supports homogeneous reactor model.•AFIDA ignition delay data successfully supports chem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fuel (Guildford) 2020-04, Vol.265, p.116929, Article 116929 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Constant volume combustion chamber performs fuel ignition delay measurements.•Developed CFD model accounts for physical mixing and chemical kinetic process effects.•Conditions identified where sufficient mixing supports homogeneous reactor model.•AFIDA ignition delay data successfully supports chemical kinetic model validation.
Advanced combustion engine strategies that can offer increased efficiency and reduced emissions are enabled by numerical engine combustion simulations, requiring accurate chemical kinetic mechanism input. The Advanced Fuel Ignition Delay Analyzer (AFIDA) device can perform high quality, repeatable measurements of ignition delay (ID) times using small fuel quantities with high throughput. The AFIDA experiments involve liquid fuel injection into the heated and pressurized constant-volume chamber, producing an autoignition delay resulting from a combination of physical mixing and chemical kinetic processes, a complexity which makes the development of complementary numerical models necessary for the development and validation of chemical kinetic mechanisms. Modeling the device based on a homogenous approximation with reduced primary reference fuel (PRF) mechanism shows up to 75% error in the modeled vs. observed autoignition delay data for n-heptane and iso-octane at 10 bar (ɸ = 1.2–0.8) and 20 bar (ɸ = 0.6–0.4) over 973–648 K, whereas the use of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model reduces the discrepancy to within 25%. The homogenous approximation error is greatest for conditions where the observed ignition delay is short and the system is not sufficiently mixed ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116929 |