Probabilistic Forecast of Single‐Phase Flow in Porous Media With Uncertain Properties

Uncertainty about geologic makeup and properties of the subsurface renders inadequate a unique quantitative prediction of flow and transport. Instead, multiple alternative scenarios have to be explored within the probabilistic framework, typically by means of Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). These can...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2019-11, Vol.55 (11), p.8631-8645
Hauptverfasser: Jun Yang, Hyung, Boso, Francesca, Tchelepi, Hamdi A., Tartakovsky, Daniel M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Uncertainty about geologic makeup and properties of the subsurface renders inadequate a unique quantitative prediction of flow and transport. Instead, multiple alternative scenarios have to be explored within the probabilistic framework, typically by means of Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). These can be computationally expensive, and often prohibitively so, especially when the goal is to compute the tails of a distribution, that is, probabilities of rare events, which are necessary for risk assessment and decision making under uncertainty. We deploy the method of distributions to derive a deterministic equation for the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of hydraulic head in an aquifer with uncertain (random) hydraulic conductivity. The CDF equation relies on a self‐consistent closure approximation, which ensures that the resulting CDF of hydraulic head has the same mean and variance as those computed with statistical moment equations. We conduct a series of numerical experiments dealing with steady‐state two‐dimensional flow driven by either a natural hydraulic head gradient or a pumping well. These experiments reveal that the CDF method remains accurate and robust for highly heterogeneous formations with the variance of log conductivity as large as five. For the same accuracy, it is also up to four orders of magnitude faster than MCS in computing hydraulic head with a required degree of confidence (probability). Key Points Our method of distributions yields a full probabilistic description of hydraulic head The method is up to 4 orders of magnitude faster than Monte Carlo simulations The method remains accurate for large variances of log hydraulic conductivity
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1029/2019WR026090