Comparison of Darcy's law and invasion percolation simulations with buoyancy-driven CO2-brine multiphase flow in a heterogeneous sandstone core

In CO2 storage scenarios, CO2 flow is dominated by gravity and capillary forces rather than viscous forces over much of the storage space. It is unclear what is the most efficient and effective method to model CO2 flow under these conditions – standard continuum Darcy-based flow models or invasion p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of petroleum science & engineering 2017-07, Vol.155 (C), p.54-62
Hauptverfasser: Krishnamurthy, Prasanna G., Senthilnathan, Siddharth, Yoon, Hongkyu, Thomassen, Daan, Meckel, Tip, DiCarlo, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In CO2 storage scenarios, CO2 flow is dominated by gravity and capillary forces rather than viscous forces over much of the storage space. It is unclear what is the most efficient and effective method to model CO2 flow under these conditions – standard continuum Darcy-based flow models or invasion percolation models. We perform experiments using high-pressure liquid CO2 injection into a vertically-aligned heterogeneous Boise sandstone core (30cm long, 7cm diameter). Effluent measurements assure that the flow is gravity dominated, and the resulting invasion pattern is measured using X-ray computed tomography (CT). Before the flow experiment is performed, a porosity map of the core is obtained from the CT data and is used as an input to both an invasion percolation model and a Darcy-based flow model. Each simulation matched different features of the data, but neither produced a comprehensive match. The results highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each type of model. We suggest possibilities of integrating the techniques to improve predictions of buoyancy driven flow in heterogeneous media.
ISSN:0920-4105
1873-4715
DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.022