Carbon storage potential increases with increasing ratio of C₄ to C₃ grass cover and soil productivity in restored tallgrass prairies

Long-term soil carbon (C) storage is essential for reducing CO₂ in the atmosphere. Converting unproductive and environmentally sensitive agricultural lands to grasslands for bioenergy production may enhance C storage. However, a better understanding of the interacting effects of grass functional com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oecologia 2018-02, Vol.186 (2), p.565-576
Hauptverfasser: Spiesman, Brian J., Kummel, Herika, Jackson, Randall D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Long-term soil carbon (C) storage is essential for reducing CO₂ in the atmosphere. Converting unproductive and environmentally sensitive agricultural lands to grasslands for bioenergy production may enhance C storage. However, a better understanding of the interacting effects of grass functional composition (i.e., relative abundance of C₄ and C₃ grass cover) and soil productivity on C storage will help guide sustainable grassland management. Our objective was to examine the relationship between grass functional composition and potential C storage and how it varies with potential soil productivity. We estimated C inputs from above-and belowground net primary productivity (ANPP and BNPP), and heterotrophic respiration (R H) to calculate net ecosystem production (NEP), a measure of potential soil C storage, in grassland plots of relatively highand low-productivity soils spanning a gradient in the ratio of C₄ to C₃ grass cover (C₄: C₃). NEP increased with increasing C₄: C₃, but only in potentially productive soils. The positive relationship likely stemmed from increased ANPP, rather than BNPP, which was possibly related to efficient resource-use and physiological/anatomical advantages of C₄ plants. R H was negatively correlated with C₄: C₃, possibly because of changes in microclimate or plant–microbe interactions. It is possible that in potentially productive soils, C storage can be enhanced by favoring C₄ over C₃ grasses through increased ANPP and BNPP and reduced R H. Results also suggest that potential C storage gains from C₄ productivity would not be undermined by a corresponding increase in R H.
ISSN:0029-8549
1432-1939
DOI:10.1007/s00442-017-4036-8