Adapted tube cleaning practices to reduce particulate contamination at hydrogen fueling stations

The higher rate of component failure and downtime during initial operation in hydrogen stations is not well understood. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has been collecting failed components from retail and research hydrogen fueling stations in California and Colorado and analyzing th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of hydrogen energy 2019-04, Vol.44 (17), p.8692-8698
Hauptverfasser: Terlip, D., Hartmann, K., Martin, J., Rivkin, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The higher rate of component failure and downtime during initial operation in hydrogen stations is not well understood. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has been collecting failed components from retail and research hydrogen fueling stations in California and Colorado and analyzing them using an optical zoom and scanning electron microscope. The results show stainless steel metal particulate contamination. While it is difficult to definitively know the origin of the contaminants, a possible source of the metal particulates is improper tube cleaning practices. To understand the impact of different cleaning procedures, NREL performed an experiment to quantify the particulates introduced from newly cut tubes. The process of tube cutting, threading and beveling, which is performed most often during station fabrication, is shown to introduce metal contaminants and thus is an area that could benefit from improved cleaning practices. This paper shows how these particulates can be reduced, which could prevent station downtime and costly repair. These results are from the initial phase of a project in which NREL intends to further investigate the sources of particulate contamination in hydrogen stations. •Filters from sonicated tubing had less mass difference than filters from tubing cleaned with the air and rag method.•Using a tube brush instead of the common air and rag method when cleaning a tube can reduce particulates.•The tube brush and the sonication cleaning methods are statistically indistinguishable in reducing particles.•The number of particles on the filters were not statistically different for the two tubing sizes.
ISSN:0360-3199
1879-3487
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.190