On Which Microphysical Time Scales to Use in Studies of Entrainment‐Mixing Mechanisms in Clouds

The commonly used time scales in entrainment‐mixing studies are examined to seek the most appropriate one, based on aircraft observations of cumulus clouds from the RACORO campaign and numerical simulations with the Explicit Mixing Parcel Model. The time scales include the following: τevap, the time...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2018-04, Vol.123 (7), p.3740-3756
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Chunsong, Liu, Yangang, Zhu, Bin, Yum, Seong Soo, Krueger, Steven K., Qiu, Yujun, Niu, Shengjie, Luo, Shi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The commonly used time scales in entrainment‐mixing studies are examined to seek the most appropriate one, based on aircraft observations of cumulus clouds from the RACORO campaign and numerical simulations with the Explicit Mixing Parcel Model. The time scales include the following: τevap, the time for droplet complete evaporation; τphase, the time for saturation ratio deficit (S) to reach 1/e of its initial value; τsatu, the time for S to reach −0.5%; and τreact, the time for complete droplet evaporation or S to reach −0.5%. It is found that the proper time scale to use depends on the specific objectives of entrainment‐mixing studies. First, if the focus is on the variations of liquid water content (LWC) and S, then τreact for saturation, τsatu and τphase are almost equivalently appropriate, because they all represent the rate of dry air reaching saturation or of LWC decrease. Second, if one focuses on the variations of droplet size and number concentration, τreact for complete evaporation and τevap are proper because they characterize how fast droplets evaporate and whether number concentration decreases. Moreover, τreact for complete evaporation and τevap are always positively correlated with homogeneous mixing degree (ψ); thus, the two time scales, especially τevap, are recommended for developing parameterizations. However, ψ and the other time scales can be negatively, positively, or not correlated, depending on the dominant factors of the entrained air (i.e., relative humidity or aerosols). Third, all time scales are proportional to each other under certain microphysical and thermodynamic conditions. Key Points The proper time scales to use depend on the specific objectives of entrainment‐mixing studies and can be unified under certain conditions If one focuses on variations of liquid water content and saturation deficit, phase relaxation time and other two time scales are proper If one focuses on variations of droplet size and number concentration, droplet evaporation time and another related time scale are proper
ISSN:2169-897X
2169-8996
DOI:10.1002/2017JD027985