Understanding Variability To Reduce the Energy and GHG Footprints of U.S. Ethylene Production

Recent growth in U.S. ethylene production due to the shale gas boom is affecting the U.S. chemical industry’s energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions footprints. To evaluate these effects, a systematic, first-principles model of the cradle-to-gate ethylene production system was developed and appli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2015-12, Vol.49 (24), p.14704-14716
Hauptverfasser: Yao, Yuan, Graziano, Diane J, Riddle, Matthew, Cresko, Joe, Masanet, Eric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent growth in U.S. ethylene production due to the shale gas boom is affecting the U.S. chemical industry’s energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions footprints. To evaluate these effects, a systematic, first-principles model of the cradle-to-gate ethylene production system was developed and applied. The variances associated with estimating the energy consumption and GHG emission intensities of U.S. ethylene production, both from conventional natural gas and from shale gas, are explicitly analyzed. A sensitivity analysis illustrates that the large variances in energy intensity are due to process parameters (e.g., compressor efficiency), and that large variances in GHG emissions intensity are due to fugitive emissions from upstream natural gas production. On the basis of these results, the opportunities with the greatest leverage for reducing the energy and GHG footprints are presented. The model and analysis provide energy analysts and policy makers with a better understanding of the drivers of energy use and GHG emissions associated with U.S. ethylene production. They also constitute a rich data resource that can be used to evaluate options for managing the industry’s footprints moving forward.
ISSN:0013-936X
1520-5851
DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b03851