Measuring the Absorption Rate of CO 2 in Nonaqueous CO 2 ‐Binding Organic Liquid Solvents with a Wetted‐Wall Apparatus

The kinetics of the absorption of CO 2 into two nonaqueous CO 2 ‐binding organic liquid (CO 2 BOL) solvents were measured at T =35, 45, and 55 °C with a wetted‐wall column. Selected CO 2 loadings were run with a so‐called “first‐generation” CO 2 BOL, comprising an independent base and alcohol, and a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ChemSusChem 2015-11, Vol.8 (21), p.3617-3625
Hauptverfasser: Mathias, Paul M., Zheng, Feng, Heldebrant, David J., Zwoster, Andy, Whyatt, Greg, Freeman, Charles M., Bearden, Mark D., Koech, Phillip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The kinetics of the absorption of CO 2 into two nonaqueous CO 2 ‐binding organic liquid (CO 2 BOL) solvents were measured at T =35, 45, and 55 °C with a wetted‐wall column. Selected CO 2 loadings were run with a so‐called “first‐generation” CO 2 BOL, comprising an independent base and alcohol, and a “second‐generation” CO 2 BOL, in which the base and alcohol were conjoined. Liquid‐film mass‐transfer coefficient ( k ′ g ) values for both solvents were measured to be comparable to values for monoethanolamine and piperazine aqueous solvents under a comparable driving force, in spite of far higher solution viscosities. An inverse temperature dependence of the k ′ g value was also observed, which suggests that the physical solubility of CO 2 in organic liquids may be making CO 2 mass transfer faster than expected. Aspen Plus software was used to model the kinetic data and compare the CO 2 absorption behavior of nonaqueous solvents with that of aqueous solvent platforms. This work continues our development of the CO 2 BOL solvents. Previous work established the thermodynamic properties related to CO 2 capture. The present paper quantitatively studies the kinetics of CO 2 capture and develops a rate‐based model.
ISSN:1864-5631
1864-564X
DOI:10.1002/cssc.201500288