Modeling cross-hole slug tests in an unconfined aquifer
•Extension of unconfined slug test model to observation wells.•Application of model to field data collected in cross-hole slug tests.•Estimation of hydraulic parameters from observation well data.•Importance of high signal-to-noise ratio late-time data for specific yield estimation. A modified versi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2016-09, Vol.540, p.784-796 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Extension of unconfined slug test model to observation wells.•Application of model to field data collected in cross-hole slug tests.•Estimation of hydraulic parameters from observation well data.•Importance of high signal-to-noise ratio late-time data for specific yield estimation.
A modified version of a published slug test model for unconfined aquifers is applied to cross-hole slug test data collected in field tests conducted at the Widen site in Switzerland. The model accounts for water-table effects using the linearized kinematic condition. The model also accounts for inertial effects in source and observation wells. The primary objective of this work is to demonstrate applicability of this semi-analytical model to multi-well and multi-level pneumatic slug tests. The pneumatic perturbation was applied at discrete intervals in a source well and monitored at discrete vertical intervals in observation wells. The source and observation well pairs were separated by distances of up to 4m. The analysis yielded vertical profiles of hydraulic conductivity, specific storage, and specific yield at observation well locations. The hydraulic parameter estimates are compared to results from prior pumping and single-well slug tests conducted at the site, as well as to estimates from particle size analyses of sediment collected from boreholes during well installation. The results are in general agreement with results from prior tests and are indicative of a sand and gravel aquifer. Sensitivity analysis show that model identification of specific yield is strongest at late-time. However, the usefulness of late-time data is limited due to the low signal-to-noise ratios. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-1694 1879-2707 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.060 |