Quadrupole anisotropy in dihadron azimuthal correlations in central d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV

The PHENIX collaboration at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) reports measurements of azimuthal dihadron correlations near midrapidity in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV. These measurements complement recent analyses by experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) involving central...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review letters 2013, Vol.111 (21)
Hauptverfasser: Adare, A., Atomssa, E. T., Conesa del Valle, Z., d'Enterria, D., Drapier, O., Fleuret, F., Gonin, M., Granier de Cassagnac, R., Roche, G., Jouan, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The PHENIX collaboration at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) reports measurements of azimuthal dihadron correlations near midrapidity in d+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV. These measurements complement recent analyses by experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) involving central p+Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV, which have indicated strong anisotropic long-range correlations in angular distributions of hadron pairs. The origin of these anisotropies is currently unknown. Various competing explanations include parton saturation and hydrodynamic flow. We observe qualitatively similar anisotropies at RHIC to those seen at the LHC, and when both are divided by an estimate of the initial-state eccentricity, the anisotropies follow a common multiplicity scaling. This scaling is also found to extend to heavy ion data at RHIC and the LHC, where the anisotropies are widely thought to be due to hydrodynamic flow. The results presented here, at much lower collision energy and with a deuteron projectile (instead of a proton), provide important new information for understanding the origin of these new long-range correlations.
ISSN:0031-9007
1079-7114
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.212301