Comparative Study of the Capacity and Rate Capability of LiNiyMnyCo1–2yO2 (y = 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, 0.33)

An unresolved question for the layered oxides is: what is the optimum value of y in the formula LiNi{sub y}Mn{sub y}Co{sub 1-2y}O{sub 2} for energy storage at moderate reaction rates? Here we report a systematic study of the specific capacity, rate capability and cycle life of Li{sub x}Ni{sub y}Mn{s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2011-01, Vol.158 (5), p.A516
Hauptverfasser: Li, Zheng, Chernova, Natasha A., Roppolo, Megan, Upreti, Shailesh, Petersburg, Cole, Alamgir, Faisal M., Whittingham, M. Stanley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An unresolved question for the layered oxides is: what is the optimum value of y in the formula LiNi{sub y}Mn{sub y}Co{sub 1-2y}O{sub 2} for energy storage at moderate reaction rates? Here we report a systematic study of the specific capacity, rate capability and cycle life of Li{sub x}Ni{sub y}Mn{sub y}Co{sub 1-2y}O{sub 2}(y = 0.5, 0.45, 0.4, and 0.333). The voltage of the Li/y = 0.333 couple crosses over those of lower cobalt content for x < 0.55, as the Co redox begins to get involved. This early involvement of cobalt, rather than just Ni, leads to a slightly smaller specific capacity for y = 0.333 than for LiNi{sub y}Mn{sub y}Co{sub 1-2y}O{sub 2} with y > 0.333 when charging above 4 V. Overall the y = 0.4 material has the optimum properties, having the highest theoretical capacity, less of the expensive cobalt and yet rate capabilities and capacity retention comparable to the y = 0.333 material.
ISSN:0013-4651
1945-7111
DOI:10.1149/1.3562212