Überlegungen zum ontischen Status des Geldes: About the Ontic Status of Money
Ranging from Plato to Marx, one can only find a few philosophers who have talked about money without detesting it. Naturally, economists are avoiding such an attitude. But they deliver only functional definitions, nothing which could give a hint at the essence of money. The essay tries to clarify it...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 2019-12, Vol.105 (4), p.536-552 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Ranging from Plato to Marx, one can only find a few philosophers who have talked about money without detesting it. Naturally, economists are avoiding such an attitude. But they deliver only functional definitions, nothing which could give a hint at the essence of money. The essay tries to clarify it by delineating a currency as an ‘ens ficitivum’ – created by our semiotic activities, which have been analysed by Charles Sanders Peirce. So, the thesis is: Money is basically a sign indicating at a present time one’s ability to handle future events. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-2343 2363-5606 |