Impact of delayed graft function on clinical outcomes in highly sensitized patients after deceased-donor kidney transplantation

We investigated whether the development of delayed graft function (DGF) in pre-sensitized patients affects the clinical outcomes after deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). The study included 709 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from three transplant centers. We divided KTRs into four sub...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation and research 2021, 35(3), , pp.149-160
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Seong Gyu, Hong, Suyeon, Lee, Hanbi, Eum, Sang Hun, Kim, Young Soo, Jin, Kyubok, Han, Seungyeop, Yang, Chul Woo, Park, Woo Yeong, Chung, Byung Ha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We investigated whether the development of delayed graft function (DGF) in pre-sensitized patients affects the clinical outcomes after deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). The study included 709 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from three transplant centers. We divided KTRs into four subgroups (highly sensitized DGF, highly sensitized non-DGF, low-sensitized DGF, and low-sensitized non-DGF) according to panel reactive antibody level of 50%, or DGF development. We compared post-transplant clinical outcomes among the four subgroups. Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was higher in two highly sensitized subgroups than in low-sensitized subgroups. It tended to be higher in highly sensitized DGF subgroups than in the highly sensitized non-DGF subgroups. In addition, the highly sensitized DGF subgroup showed the highest risk for BPAR (hazard ratio, 3.051; P=0.005) and independently predicted BPAR. Allograft function was lower in the two DGF subgroups than in the non-DGF subgroup until one month after transplantation, but thereafter it was similar. Death-censored graft loss rates and patient mortality tended to be low when DGF developed, but it did not reach statistical significance. DGF development in highly sensitized patients increases the risk for BPAR in DDKT compared with patients without DGF, suggesting the need for strict monitoring and management of such cases.
ISSN:2671-8790
3022-6783
2671-8804
3022-7712
DOI:10.4285/kjt.21.0014