Efficacy and safety of modified tract dilation technique using simultaneous pulling of proximal and distal ends of a guidewire for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in modified supine position

Recently, the needs for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have become more increased because of an easy approach for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. However, making a nephrostomy tract during supine PCNL is more difficult than prone position due to movable kidney. To overcome this l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative and clinical urology 2021, 62(2), , pp.186-194
Hauptverfasser: Chung, Jae Wook, Ha, Heon, Park, Dong Jin, Ha, Yun Sok, Lee, Jun Nyung, Chun, So Young, Kwon, Tae Gyun, Kim, Bum Soo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recently, the needs for supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have become more increased because of an easy approach for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. However, making a nephrostomy tract during supine PCNL is more difficult than prone position due to movable kidney. To overcome this limitation, we used a modified nephrostomy tract dilation (MTD) technique using guidewire traction. From January 2014 to June 2019, a total of 259 patients underwent PCNL in the modified supine position. Among them, the MTD technique was performed in 171 patients. For the MTD technique, two hydrophilic guidewires were passed from the nephrostomy tract and brought out through the urethra, then both proximal and distal ends were contralaterally pulled with tension for the easy placement of a fascia-cutting needle and a balloon catheter. We analyzed the efficacy of this technique in comparison with the conventional method. Intraoperative radiation exposure time (RET) (68.87 vs. 212.11 s) and hospital stay (5.90 vs. 6.74 days) were significantly shorter, while the success rate (77.2% vs. 63.6%) was significantly higher in the MTD group. Multivariate analysis showed that only the maximal stone diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.928; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.314-2.828; p=0.001) and MTD technique (OR, 0.017; 95% CI, 0.007-0.040; p
ISSN:2466-0493
2466-054X
DOI:10.4111/icu.20200276