Formulating Reduced-fat Sausages with Quinoa or Teff Flours: Effects on Emulsion Characteristics and Product Quality
This study dealt with the use of quinoa flour (QF) or teff flour (TF) as partial beef fat replacers in the formulation of emulsion-type sausages. A control (C) group was manufactured with 20% beef fat, while the other three groups were formulated with 10% beef fat plus 5% QF (Q), 5% TF (T), and 2.5%...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food science of animal resources 2020, 40(5), , pp.710-721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study dealt with the use of quinoa flour (QF) or teff flour (TF) as partial
beef fat replacers in the formulation of emulsion-type sausages. A control (C)
group was manufactured with 20% beef fat, while the other three groups
were formulated with 10% beef fat plus 5% QF (Q), 5% TF
(T), and 2.5% QF+2.5% TF (QT). Water-holding capacity of
the emulsions was higher in Q (81.81%), T (82.20%), and QT
(84.10%) samples than in C (64.83%) samples. Total expressible
fluid and expressible fat were the lowest in Q and T samples, indicating the
highest emulsion stability of those groups. Incorporation of QF and TF into
formulations increased moisture and carbohydrate contents while decreased fat
and energy values. Besides, the use of QF was effective to increase protein and
dietary fiber contents. T sausages had lower luminosity (L*) and higher
yellowness (b*) than C sausages, whilst Q sausages did not result in significant
color changes. Higher cook yield values were recorded in Q (97.96%), T
(98.21%), and QT (98.15%) samples compared with C (96.44%)
samples. Inclusion of QF and TF to formulation led to lower hardness and
gumminess, while utilization of TF was also effective to decrease chewiness.
Consequently, healthier emulsified sausages were obtained by the inclusion of QF
or TF that could decrease the fat content more than 50% without
sacrificing overall quality, bringing advantages by quinoa over teff for
increasing nutritional value and leading minimal modifications on color and
texture. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2636-0772 2636-0780 |
DOI: | 10.5851/kosfa.2020.e46 |