Expert-level segmentation using deep learning for volumetry of polycystic kidney and liver

PURPOSEVolumetry is used in polycystic kidney and liver diseases (PKLDs), including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), to assess disease progression and drug efficiency. However, since no rapid and accurate method for volumetry has been developed, volumetry has not yet been establ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative and clinical urology 2020, 61(6), , pp.555-564
Hauptverfasser: Shin, Tae Young, Kim, Hyunsuk, Lee, Joong-Hyup, Choi, Jong-Suk, Min, Hyun-Seok, Cho, Hyungjoo, Kim, Kyungwook, Kang, Geon, Kim, Jungkyu, Yoon, Sieun, Park, Hyungyu, Hwang, Yeong Uk, Kim, Hyo Jin, Han, Miyeun, Bae, Eunjin, Yoon, Jong Woo, Rha, Koon Ho, Lee, Yong Seong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSEVolumetry is used in polycystic kidney and liver diseases (PKLDs), including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), to assess disease progression and drug efficiency. However, since no rapid and accurate method for volumetry has been developed, volumetry has not yet been established in clinical practice, hindering the development of therapies for PKLD. This study presents an artificial intelligence (AI)-based volumetry method for PKLD. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe performance of AI was first evaluated in comparison with ground-truth (GT). We trained a V-net-based convolutional neural network on 175 ADPKD computed tomography (CT) segmentations, which served as the GT and were agreed upon by 3 experts using images from 214 patients analyzed with volumetry. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC), interobserver correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots of 39 GT and AI segmentations in the validation set were compared. Next, the performance of AI on the segmentation of 50 random CT images was compared with that of 11 PKLD specialists based on the resulting DSC and ICC. RESULTSThe DSC and ICC of the AI were 0.961 and 0.999729, respectively. The error rate was within 3% for approximately 95% of the CT scans (error
ISSN:2466-0493
2466-054X
DOI:10.4111/icu.20200086