Propofol과 Remifentanil을 사용한 복강경하 질식 전자궁적출술 후 정맥 통증자가조절 시 Ondansetron의 정맥 내 일회 주입과 지속적 주입방법이 술 후 오심, 구토에 미치는 영향 비교
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of continuous infusion of ondansetron compared with bolus injection on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Methods: Sixty three women undergoing laparoscopic-assiste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Korean journal of anesthesiology 2008, 54(4), , pp.422-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | kor |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of continuous infusion of ondansetron compared with bolus injection on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Methods: Sixty three women undergoing laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy were randomly allocated according to the method of ondansetron administration: bolus injection of ondansetron (8 mg) after the operation (Bolus group, n=21); continuous infusion after ondansetron (8 mg) mixed to PCA (PCA 8 mix group, n = 22); and continuous infusion after ondansetron (16 mg) mixed to PCA (PCA 16 mix group, n=20). The PONV were measured at 1 hr, 6 hr, 24 hr and 48 hr after operation and pain scores (visual analog scale, VAS) were checked. Results: The incidence of PONV during 48 hr in the Bolus group (23.8%) and PCA 16 mix group (20.0%) were significantly lower than PCA 8 mix group (54.5%) (P<0.05). The three groups showed similar VAS pain scores. Conclusions: Our results suggest that continuous infusion of ondansetron 16 mg is as effective as a bolus injection of ondansetron (8 mg) at preventing PONV in high-risk patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2005-6419 2005-7563 |