후두 현미경하 미세 수술에서 혈역학적 변화를 최소화하는 Propofol과 Remifentanil의 적정 용량

Background: Laryngeal microscopic surgery (LMS) is stressful to the patient due to intubation and suspension laryngoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dosages of propofol and remifentanil for minimizing hemodynamic changes during LMS. Methods: Eighty outpatients undergoing LMS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Korean journal of anesthesiology 2008, 53(3), , pp.314-319
Hauptverfasser: 강태욱, Tai Ug Kang, 신황철, Hwang Cheol Shin, 임형선, Hyung Sun Lim, 고성훈, Seong Hoon Ko, 한영진, Young Jin Han, 김동찬, Dong Chan Kim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Laryngeal microscopic surgery (LMS) is stressful to the patient due to intubation and suspension laryngoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dosages of propofol and remifentanil for minimizing hemodynamic changes during LMS. Methods: Eighty outpatients undergoing LMS were randomly divided into four groups. In all patients, endotracheal intubation was done with an effect-site concentration of propofol at 3 or 4μg/ml. Group I (propofol 3μg/ml) and II (propofol 4μg/ml) patients received remifentanil 0.5μg/kg and an infusion at 0.1μg/kg/min. Group III (propofol 3μg/ml) and IV (propofol 4μg/ml) patients received remifentanil 1.0μg/kg and an infusion at 0.2μg/kg/min. Hemodynamic changes and bispectral index (BIS) values during intubation and suspension laryngoscopy were compared among the groups. In addition, extubation time, emergence time, and state of recovery (Steward score) were compared. Results: After intubation and suspension laryngoscopy, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly lower than baseline values in groups II and IV (P<0.05). After suspension laryngoscopy, the heart rate (HR) was significantly lower than baseline value in group II (P<0.05). Extubation time was significantly shorter in groups I, II, and III compared to group IV, and the time for responding to verbal commands was significantly shorter in groups I and II compared to group IV (P<0.05). The incidence of hypotension was higher in group IV than in the other groups (P<0.05). Conclusions: The results suggest that an effect-site concentration of propofol at 4μg/ml with remifentanil 0.5μg/kg and infusion of 0.1μg/kg/min provide proper anesthesia with minimal hemodynamic changes during LMS. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2008; 55: 314~9)
ISSN:2005-6419
2005-7563