Incidental Thyroid Lesions Detected on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/CT in Patients with Non-Thyroidal Cancer: Clinical Implications and the Value of Ultrasound

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical implications of subsequent ultrasound (US) for incidental thyroid lesions (ITLs) detected on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with non-thyroidal cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively searched for ITLs in 2703 patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology 2014, 71(3), , pp.111-119
Hauptverfasser: 이광희, 신정희, 한부경, 고은영, 고은숙, 한수연, 최준영
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To evaluate the clinical implications of subsequent ultrasound (US) for incidental thyroid lesions (ITLs) detected on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with non-thyroidal cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively searched for ITLs in 2703 patients with non-thyroidal cancer on 3226 PET/CT examinations. We divided the patients into two groups: US-performed and US-not performed groups. Diagnostic performance of US in detecting malignancy was analyzed according to the PET/CT findings. Results: The incidence of ITLs on PET/CT in patients with non-thyroidal cancer was 8.4% (226/2703). Death rate from disease and stage were not significantly different between the groups. The malignant rate of ITLs that had cytopathology was 39% (22/57). All malignancies were primary thyroid cancers except for one metastasis. Overall diagnostic performance of US was 87% sensitivity, 66% specificity, 66% positive predictive value (PPV), and 89% negative predictive value (NPV). The diagnostic performance of US according to the PET/CT findings was probable benign on PET/CT (n = 9): 100% specificity, 100% NPV; suspicious malignant on PET/CT (n = 22): 75% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 90% PPV, 75% NPV; and undetermined on PET/CT (n = 26): 100% sensitivity, 94% specificity, 91% PPV, 100% NPV. Conclusion: ITLs did not affect the prognosis of patients with non-thyroidal cancer whether subsequent US was performed or not. Subsequent US may be unnecessary for ITLs with probable benign findings on PET/CT. KCI Citation Count: 1
ISSN:2951-0805
DOI:10.3348/jksr.2014.71.3.111