Helicobacter pylori Infection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Insufficient systematic reviews were conducted in the previous meta-analyses about the prevalence of infection in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of infection in patients with CKD. A systematic review of studies that evaluated the prev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut and liver 2019, 13(6), , pp.628-641
Hauptverfasser: Shin, Suk Pyo, Bang, Chang Seok, Lee, Jae Jun, Baik, Gwang Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Insufficient systematic reviews were conducted in the previous meta-analyses about the prevalence of infection in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of infection in patients with CKD. A systematic review of studies that evaluated the prevalence of infection in patients with CKD compared to a control group was performed. Only studies with adult patients were included, and studies with renal transplant recipients or diabetic nephropathy patients were excluded. Random-effects model meta-analyses with sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to confirm the robustness of the main result. A meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore the influence of potential heterogeneity on the outcomes. The methodological quality of the included publications was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Nonrandomized Studies. Publication bias was also assessed. In total, 47 studies were identified and analyzed. The total prevalence of infection was 48.2% (1,968/4,084) in patients with CKD and 59.3% (4,097/6,908) in the control group. Pooled analysis showed a significantly lower prevalence of infection in patients with CKD (vs control group: odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.79). Sensitivity analyses revealed consistent results, and meta-regression analysis showed no significant confounders. No publication bias was detected. The results of this study suggest a lower prevalence of infection in patients with CKD.
ISSN:1976-2283
2005-1212
DOI:10.5009/gnl18517