Comparison of cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 and PANAMutyper-R- EGFR for Detection and Semi-Quantification of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Plasma and Pleural Effusion Supernatant

Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor ( ) mutation tests are less invasive than tissue mutation tests. We determined which of two kits is more efficient: cobas Mutation test v2 (cobasv2; Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA) or PANAMutyper-R- (Mutyper; Panagene, Daejeon, Korea). We also ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of laboratory medicine 2019, 39(5), , pp.478-487
Hauptverfasser: Han, A Lum, Kim, Hak Ryul, Choi, Keum Ha, Hwang, Ki Eun, Zhu, Mengyu, Huang, Yuya, Wu, Moxin, Lee, Young Jin, Park, Min Cheol, Cho, Ji Hyun, Park, Do Sim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor ( ) mutation tests are less invasive than tissue mutation tests. We determined which of two kits is more efficient: cobas Mutation test v2 (cobasv2; Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA) or PANAMutyper-R- (Mutyper; Panagene, Daejeon, Korea). We also evaluated whether pleural effusion supernatant (PE-SUP) samples are assayable, similar to plasma samples, using these two kits. We analyzed 156 plasma and PE-SUP samples (31 paired samples) from 116 individuals. We compared the kits in terms of accuracy, assessed genotype concordance (weighted κ with 95% confidence intervals), and calculated Spearman's rho between semi-quantitatively measured -mutant levels (SQIs) measured by each kit. We also compared sensitivity using 47 -mutant harboring samples divided into more-dilute and less-dilute samples (dilution ratio: ≥ or
ISSN:2234-3806
2234-3814
DOI:10.3343/alm.2019.39.5.478