Comparison of cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 and PANAMutyper-R- EGFR for Detection and Semi-Quantification of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Plasma and Pleural Effusion Supernatant
Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor ( ) mutation tests are less invasive than tissue mutation tests. We determined which of two kits is more efficient: cobas Mutation test v2 (cobasv2; Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA) or PANAMutyper-R- (Mutyper; Panagene, Daejeon, Korea). We also ev...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of laboratory medicine 2019, 39(5), , pp.478-487 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (
) mutation tests are less invasive than tissue
mutation tests. We determined which of two kits is more efficient: cobas
Mutation test v2 (cobasv2; Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA) or PANAMutyper-R-
(Mutyper; Panagene, Daejeon, Korea). We also evaluated whether pleural effusion supernatant (PE-SUP) samples are assayable, similar to plasma samples, using these two kits.
We analyzed 156 plasma and PE-SUP samples (31 paired samples) from 116 individuals. We compared the kits in terms of accuracy, assessed genotype concordance (weighted κ with 95% confidence intervals), and calculated Spearman's rho between semi-quantitatively measured
-mutant levels (SQIs) measured by each kit. We also compared sensitivity using 47
-mutant harboring samples divided into more-dilute and less-dilute samples (dilution ratio: ≥ or |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2234-3806 2234-3814 |
DOI: | 10.3343/alm.2019.39.5.478 |