Predictive Value of Interim and End-of-Therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma
Purpose 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the standard imaging modality for response evaluation in FDG-avid lymphoma, but the prognostic value is not established in follicular lymphoma (FL). This study investigated the prognostic value of Deau...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2019, 53(4), , pp.263-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
18
F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the standard imaging modality for response evaluation in FDG-avid lymphoma, but the prognostic value is not established in follicular lymphoma (FL). This study investigated the prognostic value of Deauville 5-point scale (D5PS) from paired interim PET/CT (PET
Interim
) and end-of-induction therapy PET/CT (PET
EOI
) in patients with FL.
Methods
FL staging and response assessment PET/CT images from 2013 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. PET
Interim
was performed 3 or 4 cycles after chemotherapy and PET
EOI
after 6 or 8 cycles. D5PS scores of 1, 2, and 3 were considered as negative (−), and scores 4 and 5 were considered as positive (+). Statistical analysis was done using Cox regression analysis, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log-rank test.
Results
Thirty-three patients with set of baseline, interim, and end-of-induction therapy PET/CT studies were included. Ten patients (30.3%) had progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.8 months (range 3.5–72.7 months). On PET
Interim
, 23 patients were negative and 10 were positive. On PET
EOI
scans, 29 patients were negative, and 4 were positive. On multivariate analysis, PET
EOI
(−) was associated with longer PFS. PET
Interim
(+) and PET
EOI
(+) patients had a significantly shorter PFS than PET
Interim
(−) patients (39.9 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 23.0–56.9, versus 55.5 months, 95% CI 49.7–61.2,
p
= 0.005) and PET
EOI
(−) patients (14.2 months, 95% CI 8.5–19.8, versus 60.5 months, 95% CI 52.1–69.0,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1869-3474 1869-3482 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13139-019-00602-0 |