의학강좌/놓친 유방암의 영상소견: 후향적 분석
Screening mammography has been proved to be an effective tool to detect early breast cancers and to decrease mortality. However, the rate of false-negative mammograms has been reported to be still high as 10~30%. Missed breast cancers are cancers that are visible at previous mammograms only retrospe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Taehan Ŭisa Hyŏphoe chi 2008, 51(9), 584, pp.838-848 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | kor |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Screening mammography has been proved to be an effective tool to detect early breast
cancers and to decrease mortality. However, the rate of false-negative mammograms has
been reported to be still high as 10~30%. Missed breast cancers are cancers that are visible at
previous mammograms only retrospectively and can be classified as three types; interval cancers,
subsequent screen-detected cancers, and alternative imaging-detected cancers. In a small
group, screen-detected abnormalities recalled for further evaluation may be dismissed due to
false negative diagnostic assessment, leading to delays in breast cancer diagnosis. Possible
causes for missing include perception errors, interpretation errors, and technical errors. Furthermore,
every diagnostic examination has inherent limitations. Perception errors are often attributed
to combined multiple factors; peripheral lesions, single view abnormalities, subtle findings,
distracting lesions, and dense parenchyma obscuring a lesion. To decrease the false negative
rate, radiologists should be alert to take additional mammograms and ultrasonography, and
should try to improve the image quality and interpretation techniques comparing with the
previous imaging, considering the use of computer-aided detection or double reading. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1975-8456 |