China and the North Korean Nuclear Issue: Competing Interests and Persistent Policy Dilemmas
China’s role in the North Korean nuclear issue has undergone major change in recent years. In the initial years of the Six-Party Talks, China’s role was central as facilitator, arbiter, and host of the diplomatic process. However, since 2007 the U.S.North Korea bilateral relationship has been the do...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Korean journal of defense analysis 2009, 21(1), , pp.33-47 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | China’s role in the North Korean nuclear issue has undergone major change in
recent years. In the initial years of the Six-Party Talks, China’s role was central as
facilitator, arbiter, and host of the diplomatic process. However, since 2007 the
U.S.North Korea bilateral relationship has been the dominant factor in Korean
nuclear diplomacy, largely marginalizing China and the other three powers
involved in these efforts. As a result, China has been confined principally to
hosting the talks and to rubber-stamping agreements already achieved between
Washington and Pyongyang. China continues to seek an uneasy balance among
three vital interests: (1) ensuring peace on the peninsula; (2) fostering North
Korea’s denuclearization; and (3) seeking to preserve a continued relationship
with North Korea. But it has yet to develop a full strategy for reconciling these
interests and managing its policy priorities. However, China has accelerated its
economic and political ties with both the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). Beijing therefore seems wellpositioned
for the peninsula’s longer-term evolution, including its hopes that
North Korea will ultimately move toward a more ‘‘reformist’’ orientation and a
much-diminished emphasis on military power in its national strategy. But the
dilemmas in Chinese policymaking persist, with Beijing able to influence but not
control the major uncertainties, especially those related to North Korea’s future. KCI Citation Count: 27 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1016-3271 1941-4641 |
DOI: | 10.22883/kjda.2009.21.1.003 |