Comparison of Phytoplankton Chlorophyll-a Extracted with Different Solvents
Algal chlorophyll-a is commonly determined by spectro-photometric method using 90% acetone as solvents. However, acetone has low extraction efficiency without grinding filters, and DMF (dimethyl formamide) was tested for the compatibility with acetone. Chlorophyll-a concentration was determined for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 생태와 환경, 41(4) 2008, 41(4), , pp.485-489 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Algal chlorophyll-a is commonly determined by spectro-photometric method using 90% acetone as solvents. However, acetone has low extraction efficiency without grinding filters, and DMF (dimethyl formamide) was tested for the compatibility with acetone. Chlorophyll-a concentration was determined for samples from 5 reservoirs of different trophic states and phytoplankton composition, using acetone extraction with grinding and DMF without grinding. Chlorophyll-a measured by DMF and Acetone did not show a significant difference when using trichromatic method of UNESCO and Lorenzen, and therefore, DMF can substitute acetone. But when acidification
method was applied, they showed significant difference of 8%. It can be
concluded that DMF can extract chlorophylls more effectively without grinding and it can be a better alternative for the standard extraction solvent. KCI Citation Count: 1 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2288-1115 2288-1123 |