간호행정학회지 게재 질적 논문의 연구 동향 분석(창간호~2016년)

Purpose: This study was done to analyze qualitative research published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (JKANA). Methods: Selected studies included 38 qualitative studies in which an interview was used and which were published in JKANA from 1995 to 2016 (22 years). Consolid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kanho Haengjŏng Hakhoe chi = The journal of Korean Nursing Administration Academic Society 2017, 23(4), , pp.427-438
Hauptverfasser: 박광옥(Park, Kwang-Ok), 유소영(Yu, Soyoung), 이은희(Lee, Eunhee), 김미영(Kim, Miyoung), 황지인(Hwang, Jee-In)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: This study was done to analyze qualitative research published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (JKANA). Methods: Selected studies included 38 qualitative studies in which an interview was used and which were published in JKANA from 1995 to 2016 (22 years). Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ), a reporting guideline for analysis of qualitative research was employed. Results: Items that were included in less than half of the selected studies were as follows: interviewers' credentials, occupation, gender, and relationship established with participants in the 1st domain; non-participants, presence of non-participants, and transcripts returned in the 2nd domain; participant checking in the 3rd domain. Conclusion: Findings indicate that future challenges face JKANA qualitative researchers. First, the expansion of qualitative research should be ensured to explain complex interaction between humans and the environment. Second, a variety of qualitative research methods should be considered to enhance understanding of nursing fields. Third, research procedures should be described more precisely to increase transparency of research results. Fourth, not only personal information on the researcher but also how subjective opinions of the researcher reflected in the research process should be explained in detail to clarify the relationship between researchers and participants.
ISSN:1225-9330
2288-4955