관행농 쌀 생산체계의 탄소배출량 평가를 위한 전과정평가: top-down 방식의 국가평균값과 bottom-up 방식의 사례분석값 비교

We established a top-down methodology to estimate carbon footprint as national mean value (reference) with the statistical data on agri-livestock incomes in 2007. We also established LCI (life cycle inventory) DB by a bottom-up methodology with the data obtained from interview with farmers from 4 la...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:韓國土壤肥料學會誌 2012, 45(6), , pp.1143-1152
Hauptverfasser: 유종희, 정순철, 김건엽, 이종식, 김계훈, Ryu, Jong-Hee, Jung, Soon Chul, Kim, Gun-Yeob, Lee, Jong-Sik, Kim, Kye-Hoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We established a top-down methodology to estimate carbon footprint as national mean value (reference) with the statistical data on agri-livestock incomes in 2007. We also established LCI (life cycle inventory) DB by a bottom-up methodology with the data obtained from interview with farmers from 4 large-scale farms at Gunsan, Jeollabuk-do province to estimate carbon footprint in 2011. This study was carried out to compare top-down methodology and bottom-up methodology in performing LCA (life cycle assessment) to analyze the difference in GHGs (greenhouse gases) emission and carbon footprint under conventional rice cultivation system. Results of LCI analysis showed that most of $CO_2$ was emitted during fertilizer production and rice cultivation, whereas $CH_4$ and $N_2O$ were mostly emitted during rice cultivation. The carbon footprints on conventional rice production system were 2.39E+00 kg $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$ by top-down methodology, whereas 1.04E+00 kg $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$ by bottom-up methodology. The amount of agro-materials input during the entire rice cultivation for the two methodologies was similar. The amount of agro-materials input for the bottom-up methodology was sometimes greater than that for top-down methodology. While carbon footprint by the bottom-up methodology was smaller than that by the top-down methodology due to higher yield per cropping season by the bottom-up methodology. Under the conventional rice production system, fertilizer production showed the highest contribution to the environmental impacts on most categories except GWP (global warming potential) category. Rice cultivation was the highest contribution to the environmental impacts on GWP category under the conventional rice production system. The main factors of carbon footprints under the conventional rice production system were $CH_4$ emission from rice paddy field, the amount of fertilizer input and rice yield. Results of this study will be used for establishing baseline data for estimating carbon footprint from 'low carbon certification pilot project' as well as for developing farming methods of reducing $CO_2$ emission from rice paddy fields. 본 연구진은 2007년 농진청과 통계청에서 수집한 농축산물소득자료 통계 값으로 국가평균 탄소성적을 산정하는 top-down 방식의 자료수집 방법을 구축하였다. 또한, 본 연구진은 2011년 전북 군산 지역 관행농 쌀 생산 농가 중 벼 평균 재배면적이 3.3 ha인 네 곳의 대규모 생산농가를 섭외하여 면접조사로 사례를 분석하는 bottom-up 방식의 전과정 목록 (LCI, life cycle Inventory)도 구축하였다. 본 연구는 관행농 쌀 생산체계에 대한 전과정 평가를 국립농업과학원에서 구축한 top-down 방식과 사례분석을 통한 bottom-up 방식으로 수행한 결과를 비교하
ISSN:0367-6315
2288-2162
DOI:10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.6.1143