Bioequivalence of the pharmacokinetics between two formulations of 0.2 mg tamsulosin hydrochloride in healthy subjects

Tamsulosin is an effective therapeutic option for lower urinary tract symptoms, as it selectively blocks α1A- and α1D-adrenoceptors in the bladder and prostate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of two 0.2 mg tamsulosin formulations when admini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational and clinical pharmacology 2015, 23(1), , pp.21-25
Hauptverfasser: Park, Sang-In, Rhee, Su-jin, Jang, In-Jin, Yu, Kyung-Sang, Yim, Sung-Vin, Kim, Bo-Hyung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Tamsulosin is an effective therapeutic option for lower urinary tract symptoms, as it selectively blocks α1A- and α1D-adrenoceptors in the bladder and prostate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of two 0.2 mg tamsulosin formulations when administered as the reference formulation (Yuropa® sustained-release tablet) vs. the test formulation (Yutanal® capsule) in healthy male subjects. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, twoway, two-period, crossover study was conducted in 37 healthy volunteers. The 0.2 mg of tamsulosin as the test or the reference formulation were administered during each period, and serial blood samples were collected up to 36 hours after dosing for PK analyses. A non-compartmental analysis was used to estimate the PK parameters. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the two formulations to compare the maximum concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast). The mean Cmax and AUClast for the test formulation were 6.19 μg/L and 71.30 μg.h/L, respectively, and 5.76 μg/L and 70.38 μg.h /L for the reference formulation, respectively. The GMRs (90% CIs) of the Cmax and AUClast between the two formulations were 1.09 (1.01–1.17) and 1.03 (0.96–1.10), respectively. Tamsulosin 0.2 mg as the test formulation exhibited bioequivalent PK profiles to those of the reference formulation. Therefore, the test formulation is expected to be an alternative to the reference formulation without concerns about differences in drug exposure KCI Citation Count: 0
ISSN:2289-0882
2383-5427
DOI:10.12793/tcp.2015.23.1.21