Horizontal mergers, involuntary unemployment, and welfare
Standard welfare analysis of horizontal mergers usually refers to two effects: the anticompetitive market power effect reduces wel\-fare by enabling firms to charge prices above marginal costs, where\-as the procompetitive efficiency effect increases welfare by reduc\-ing the costs of production (sy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic research 2016, 21(3), , pp.297-317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Standard welfare analysis of horizontal mergers usually refers to two effects: the anticompetitive market power effect reduces wel\-fare by enabling firms to charge prices above marginal costs, where\-as the procompetitive efficiency effect increases welfare by reduc\-ing the costs of production (synergies). However, well-accepted demand-side effects of synergies (income feedback effects, `Ford ef\-fects') are usually neglected in this literature. We introduce them into a standard oligopoly model of horizontal merger by assuming an (empirically supported) decrease in labour demand due to merg\-er-specific synergies and derive welfare effects. We find that effi\-ciency benefits from horizontal mergers are substantially decreased, if involuntary unemployment exists. However, in full employment economies, demand-side effects remain negligible. Eventually, poli\-cy conclusions for merger control are discussed. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1226-4261 |
DOI: | 10.17256/jer.2016.21.3.001 |