심부전증 환자에서 Valsartan과 Ramipril의 임상적 효과 비교
Background and Objectives: Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) has emerged as an alternative to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) for the treatment of heart failure. This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness and safety of valsartan with ramipril in patients with heart failure, a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Korean circulation journal 2008, 38(2), , pp.101-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | kor |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Objectives: Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) has emerged as an alternative to angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) for the treatment of heart failure. This study aimed at comparing the effectiveness
and safety of valsartan with ramipril in patients with heart failure, and these patients were hospitalized at
Chonnam National University Hospital, Wonkwang University Hospital, Gunsan Medical Center, Presbyterian
Medical Center, Seonam University Hospital and Gwangju Christian Hospital. Subjects and Methods: Between
March 2005 and March 2007, 82 patients (60.5±12.4 years, 59 males) who complained of class II to IV dyspnea,
according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, and who had low left ventricular ejection
fraction (LVEF) less than 50% were randomly allocated to valsartan or ramipril. After 6 months, the clinical symptoms,
vital signs, biochemical tests and echocardiography were compared between the two groups. Results: The
NYHA class was improved in both groups (the valsartan group: 2.31±0.51 vs. 1.46±0.58, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1738-5520 1738-5555 |