Improvement in left ventricular systolic dyssynchrony in hypertensive patients after treatment of hypertension

Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony has been commonly detected among hypertensive patients with normal LV systolic function and no evidence of congestive heart failure. The purpose of our study was to assess the changes in LV systolic dyssynchrony (SDS(LV)) among hypertensive patients after antihyper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Korean circulation journal 2011, 41(1), , pp.16-22
Hauptverfasser: Bae, Byung Seok, Kim, Ki Ju, Park, Jung Gil, Jung, Yeoun Su, Ryu, Han Jun, Kang, Hyun Jae, Lee, Bong Ryeol, Jung, Byung Chun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony has been commonly detected among hypertensive patients with normal LV systolic function and no evidence of congestive heart failure. The purpose of our study was to assess the changes in LV systolic dyssynchrony (SDS(LV)) among hypertensive patients after antihypertensive treatment, and to determine the relationship between SDS(LV) and other conventional echocardiographic parameters. Forty one hypertensive patients with normal LV ejection fraction were enrolled. By performing a conventional echocardiographic study, the SDS(LV) was measured as the time difference between the shortest and longest time of the peak myocardial systolic velocities among 12 segments of the basal and mid-levels of the 3 apical views, and radial dyssynchrony of the basal (RDS(base)) and mid-levels (RDS(mid)) measured as the time difference between the earliest and latest peak values on the radial strain curves of each level of the parasternal short-axis views. Compared to baseline after six months of antihypertensive treatment, the SDS(LV) improved significantly (48.7±37.9 ms vs. 29.5±34.1 ms, p=0.020). Also the RDS(base) and RDS(mid) improved significantly in respect to the baseline values (129.9±136.3 ms vs. 38.8±45.4 ms, p=0.002 and 75.2±63.8 ms vs. 28.2±37.7 ms, respectively, p
ISSN:1738-5520
1738-5555
DOI:10.4070/kcj.2011.41.1.16