Comparison of Safety after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Between Octogenarians and Counterparts with Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Elderly patients usually have comorbid and poor general conditions. They are more likely to have complex coronary lesions with cardiac dysfunction. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in octogenarians remains controversial. In this study, we determined the safety after PCI for octog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of geriatric medicine and research 2015, 19(3), , pp.158-164
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Byung Ki, Kim, Su Hyun, Jin, Suk Je, Jeong, Yong Jin, Jang, Seung Jae, Bang, Jun Hee, Jung, Young Gon, Kang, Soon Hyoung, Kim, Sung Taek, Choi, Jong In, Cho, Jang Hyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Elderly patients usually have comorbid and poor general conditions. They are more likely to have complex coronary lesions with cardiac dysfunction. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in octogenarians remains controversial. In this study, we determined the safety after PCI for octogenarians and their younger counterparts with coronary artery disease. Methods: We reviewed 1,057 patients (110 octogenarians vs. 947 younger counterparts) who underwent PCI for coronary artery disease at Saint Carollo Hospital. We analyzed the baseline characteristics, angiographic findings, in hospital mortality, and post procedural complications between the two groups. Results: The mean ages of octogenarians and younger counterparts were 83.1±4.5 years and 62.6±10.3 years, respectively. The octogenarian group had a significantly (p
ISSN:1229-2397
2508-4798
2288-1239
2508-4909
DOI:10.4235/jkgs.2015.19.3.158