Detection of vibrio cholerae O1 by using cerium oxide nanowires - based immunosensor with different antibody immobilization methods
In this work, we evaluated the effects of different antibody immobilization strategies on the response of a CeO 2 -nanowires (NWs)-based immunosensor for Vibrio cholerae O1 detection. Accordingly, the changes in the electron-transfer resistance ( R et ) from before to after cells bind to an antibody...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Korean Physical Society 2016, 68(10), , pp.1235-1245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this work, we evaluated the effects of different antibody immobilization strategies on the response of a CeO
2
-nanowires (NWs)-based immunosensor for
Vibrio cholerae
O1 detection. Accordingly, the changes in the electron-transfer resistance (
R
et
) from before to after cells bind to an antibody-modified electrode prepared by using three different methods of antibody immobilization were determined. The values were 16.2%, 8.3%, and 6.65% for the method that utilized protein A, antibodies activated by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)/N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), and absorption, respectively. Cyclic voltammetry confirmed that the change in the current was highest for the immunosensors prepared using protein A (11%), followed by those prepared with EDC/NHS-activated antibodies (9%), and finally, those prepared through absorption (7.5%). The order of the antibody immobilization strategies in terms of resulting immunosensor detection limit and sensitivity was as follows order: absorption (3.2 × 10
3
CFU/mL; 45.1 Ω/CFU·mL
−1
) < EDC/NHS-activated antibody (1.0 × 10
3
CFU/mL; 50.6 Ω/CFU·mL
−1
) < protein A (1.0 × 10
2
CFU/mL; 65.8 Ω/CFU·mL
−1
). Thus, we confirmed that the protein A - mediated method showed significantly high cell binding efficiencies compared to the random immobilization method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0374-4884 1976-8524 |
DOI: | 10.3938/jkps.68.1235 |