Upgrade in the elastic surface algorithm for airfoil inverse design with variable attack angle via controlled leading-edge movement

The elastic surface algorithm (ESA) is an iterative inverse design method for airfoils, considering the airfoil wall as an elastic curved beam pinned at its beginning and ending points. This structure deforms in response to the disparity between existing and target pressure distributions. This paper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of mechanical science and technology 2024, 38(10), , pp.5181-5193
Hauptverfasser: Drafsh, Zakaria, Nili-Ahmadabadi, Mahdi, Noorsalehi, Mohammad Hossein, Shirvani, Ahmad, Ha, Man Yeong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The elastic surface algorithm (ESA) is an iterative inverse design method for airfoils, considering the airfoil wall as an elastic curved beam pinned at its beginning and ending points. This structure deforms in response to the disparity between existing and target pressure distributions. This paper introduces an improvement to the ESA, allowing controlled movement of the airfoil’s leading edge within a vertical groove. This advancement enables the adjustment of the angle of attack during the inverse design process, enhancing the airfoil’s robustness and flexibility. In contrast to a fixed angle of attack approach, the proposed method prevents unrealistic geometric features, such as airfoil fishtailing, improving convergence potential. The developed method was validated through the inverse design of NACA0012 and FX63-137 airfoils in a viscous subsonic flow regime. The flow solver was validated using existing experimental results, showing good agreement. Finally, the pressure distribution of the FX63-137 airfoil was modified to increase lift or decrease drag. The corresponding geometries were obtained via the advanced ESA method, resulting in an almost 4 % increase in the lift-to-drag ratio.
ISSN:1738-494X
1976-3824
DOI:10.1007/s12206-024-2301-4