The clinical effectiveness of fused image of single-photon emission CT and facial CT for the evaluation of degenerative change of mandibular condylar head

Background The primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of fused images obtained from single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and facial computed tomography (CT) for evaluating degenerative changes in the mandibular condylar head. This assessment was accomp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2023, 45(0), , pp.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Jeon, Seung-Hwan, Lim, Seung-Weon, Jung, Ki-Hyun, Jeon, Jae-Yun, Kim, Sang-Yoon, Kim, Ji-Young, Choi, Yoon-Young, Hwang, Kyung-Gyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of fused images obtained from single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and facial computed tomography (CT) for evaluating degenerative changes in the mandibular condylar head. This assessment was accomplished by comparing the Technetium-99 m methylene diphosphonate ( 99m Tc-MDP) uptake ratio with the results of clinical and radiographic findings. Methods The study included 17 patients (3 males and 14 females) with suspected osteoarthritis of the mandibular condyle, totaling 34 temporomandibular joints (TMJs). Based on clinical and radiographic examinations, the TMJs were categorized into four groups: normal (group N), internal derangement (group ID), osteoarthritis (group OA), and osteoarthritis sequelae (group OA seq ). For each patient, bone SPECT and facial CT scans were registered and reconstructed to create fused SPECT/CT images. The 99m Tc-MDP uptake levels in the TMJs were statistically compared among the four groups. Results The 99m Tc-MDP uptake ratio showed a gradual increase in the order of the following: group N, group OA seq , group ID, and group OA. There was a significant difference observed among groups ( p  = 0.003), mainly driven by the disparity between group OA and both group N ( p  
ISSN:2288-8586
2288-8101
2288-8586
DOI:10.1186/s40902-023-00399-1