Comparison of pre-indwelling double-J stents versus ureteral catheters for artificial hydronephrosis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSETo compare the clinical efficacy and safety of pre-indwelling double-J stents versus ureteral catheters for artificial hydronephrosis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 1,258 patients who underwent PCNL for kidney stones from A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative and clinical urology 2022, 63(4), , pp.425-432
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Tingshuai, Quan, Keli, Yan, Cong, Yang, Tong, Zhao, Yingqi, Shu, Jianping, He, Gaofei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSETo compare the clinical efficacy and safety of pre-indwelling double-J stents versus ureteral catheters for artificial hydronephrosis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 1,258 patients who underwent PCNL for kidney stones from August 2017 to July 2020 in our hospital. Among them, 682 patients had double-J stents inserted (DJ group) and 576 patients had ureteral catheters (UC group). We analyzed baseline patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and complications in both groups. RESULTSThe puncture success rate was 97.9% and 97.4% in the DJ and UC groups, respectively (p>0.05). The operation time was 74.5±37.8 minutes in the DJ group compared with 80.8±38.5 minutes in the UC group (p=0.004). The total stone-free rate in the DJ and UC groups was 80.5% and 78.7%, respectively (p>0.05). The incidence of perioperative complications was relatively low in both groups and showed no obvious differences. In the subgroup analysis, the operation time for patients with no obvious or mild hydronephrosis preoperatively was significantly shorter in the DJ group than in the UC group (p
ISSN:2466-0493
2466-054X
DOI:10.4111/icu.20220115