Pre-budburst temperature influences the inner and outer arm morphology, phenology, flower number, fruitset, TSS accumulation and variability of Vitis vinifera L. Sauvignon Blanc bunches
Content Partner: Lincoln University. Background and Aims: Inflorescence morphology, flower formation and subsequent fruit development of grapevines are influenced by genetic, environmental and cultural practices. While the effect of temperature on inflorescence primordia number per bud is documented...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Content Partner: Lincoln University. Background and Aims: Inflorescence morphology, flower formation and subsequent fruit development of grapevines are influenced by genetic, environmental and cultural practices. While the effect of temperature on inflorescence primordia number per bud is documented, its effect during dormancy and budburst (BB) on floral development is less clear. In our study, winter dormant buds were passively heated for different of time from mid-winter (July) to BB (October).
Methods and Results: Canes were heated, pre-budburst, for different periods using polythene tunnels. Heating during winter dormancy had no effect on the number or position of inflorescences on the shoot, or on the type of structure occurring at the outer arm position of the inflorescence. Heating buds for either July or August to BB advanced the date of BB and the start date of flowering by 12-14 and 14 days respectively compared with the no-heat Control treatment. There was a significant (P |
---|