Comparing Two Weather-Robust Microphone Configurations for Outdoor Measurements

This paper discusses comparisons made between two ground-based outdoor microphone configurations. The first is known as the Compact Outdoor Unit for Ground-based Acoustical Recordings (COUGAR) and consists of an inverted microphone placed above a convex circular plate and covered by a large dome windscreen. The second configuration is the COUGARxt, where the “xt” simultaneously refers to an extra thick windscreen and an extra thin ground plate. COUGAR and COUGARxt were subjected to laboratory testing where their responses to sound were recorded at several different elevation and azimuthal angles. At almost all shown elevation angles, both configurations recorded levels that were within ±3 dB of a baseline measurement between 50 Hz – 20 kHz. At all shown azimuthal angles and over the same frequency range, both recorded levels within ±2 dB of the levels reported at an azimuthal angle of 0°, with COUGARxt having less variation than COUGAR. The configurations were also subjected to wind noise testing, where COUGARxt demonstrated superior wind noise rejection at low frequencies. The conclusion is that both configurations are suitable for outdoor acoustical measurements and that COUGARxt is the superior configuration, especially when measuring low-frequency noise.