Investigation of a Helicopter Individual Blade Control (IBC) System in Two Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Tests: Volume I

This report presents the data acquired during the testing of an individual blade control (IBC) system on a full-scale helicopter rotor in two test entries in the NASA Ames 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. The objective of these investigations was to evaluate the potential benefits of using IBC to improve rotor performance, reduce blade vortex interaction (BVI) noise, and alleviate helicopter vibrations. The wind tunnel tests were an international, collaborative effort between NASA, the U.S. Army Aeroflightdynamics Directorate, ZF Luftfahrttechnik GmbH, Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH, and the German Aerospace Laboratory (DLR). They were conducted as a task of the U.S./German Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Helicopter Aeromechanics. The IBC tests were performed using a full-scale BO-105 helicopter rotor mounted to the NASA/U.S. Army Rotor Test Apparatus (RTA). The first test, performed in 1993, was the first full-scale wind tunnel test to explore the effects of an IBC system on rotor vibration, noise, and performance. In this test, the pitch links of the rotor were replaced by servo-actuators. The servo-actuators and IBC control system were designed and manufactured by ZF Luftfahrttechnik GmbH. This control system allowed the pitch of each rotor blade to be changed independently of the other blades. The IBC inputs had large effects on the hub vibrations and BVI noise. However, the rotor hub moments were not retrimmed with each new IBC input. This resulted in an out-of-trim rotor configuration. The same IBC system was used in the second IBC test performed in 1994. This test more carefully investigated the potential of IBC to simultaneously reduce noise and vibration and also investigated the effect of IBC on rotor performance in high-speed-cruise flight. In the 1994 test, the hub moment and rotor thrust were readjusted to maintain rotor trim as the IBC inputs were applied. For this reason, the data taken from the second test are considered to be more accurate, except for some unique IBC input combinations not repeated in the second test. IBC controls that were evaluated were single-frequency inputs from 2/rev to 6/rev and multi-harmonic combinations of these frequencies to form pulses, wavelets, and doublets. Extensive data were acquired for each IBC data point. These data included rotor performance, average and time-varying hub loads, rotor blade bending loads, control system loads, inboard and outboard blade pitch motions, and BVI noise data. The rotor balance