Experimental Investigation of a Flexible Wing with a Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap Design
This paper presents experimental results of a flexible wing wind tunnel model with a variable camber continuous trailing edge flap (VCCTEF) design for drag minimization, tested at the University of Washington Aeronautical Labo- ratory (UWAL). The wind tunnel test was designed to explore the relative...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper presents experimental results of a flexible wing wind tunnel model with a variable camber continuous trailing edge flap (VCCTEF) design for drag minimization, tested at the University of Washington Aeronautical Labo- ratory (UWAL). The wind tunnel test was designed to explore the relative merit of the VCCTEF concept for improved cruise efficiency through the use of low-cost aeroelastic model test techniques. The flexible wing model is a 10-scaled model of a typical transport wing and is constructed of woven fabric composites and foam core. The wing structural stiffness in bending is tailored to be half of the stiffness of a Boeing 757-era transport wing, while the torsional stiffness is about the same. This stiffness reduction results in a wing tip deflection of about 10 of the wing semi-span. The VCCTEF is a multi-segment flap design having three chordwise camber segments and five spanwise flap sections for a total of 15 individual flap elements. The three chordwise camber segments can be positioned appropriately to create a desired trailing edge camber. Elastomeric material is used to cover the gaps in between the spanwise flap sections, thereby creating a continuous trailing edge. Wind tunnel data indicate a high degree of data correlation and repeata- bility. The VCCTEF can achieve a drag reduction of up to 6.31 and an improvement in the lift-to-drag ratio (LD) of up to 4.85. The paper also presents two methods for estimating the lift coefficient of a rigid wing using a dynamic pressure correction and an aeroelastic deflection correction. Both methods provide good estimates of the rigid-wing lift coefficient. |
---|