Quantifying possible bias in clinical and epidemiological studies with quantitative bias analysis: common approaches and limitations

Bias in epidemiological studies can adversely affect the validity of study findings. Sensitivity analyses, known as quantitative bias analyses, are available to quantify potential residual bias arising from measurement error, confounding, and selection into the study. Effective application of these...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Brown, Jeremy P, Hunnicutt, Jacob N, Ali, M Sanni, Bhaskaran, Krishnan, Cole, Ashley, Langan, Sinead M, Nitsch, Dorothea, Rentsch, Christopher T, Galwey, Nicholas W, Wing, Kevin, Douglas, Ian J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Bias in epidemiological studies can adversely affect the validity of study findings. Sensitivity analyses, known as quantitative bias analyses, are available to quantify potential residual bias arising from measurement error, confounding, and selection into the study. Effective application of these methods benefits from the input of multiple parties including clinicians, epidemiologists, and statisticians. This article provides an overview of a few common methods to facilitate both the use of these methods and critical interpretation of applications in the published literature. Examples are given to describe and illustrate methods of quantitative bias analysis. This article also outlines considerations to be made when choosing between methods and discusses the limitations of quantitative bias analysis.
ISSN:0959-8138
DOI:10.1136/bmj-2023-076365