Mid-term effect of total knee arthroplasty with and without tourniquet use on prosthesis survival, complications and functional outcome: a prospective cohort study of 511 total knee arthroplasties

Background: A tourniquet is often used to create a bloodless surgical field during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is still debated whether tourniquet use improves durability of cemented implant fixation and thereby prosthesis survival. Some studies showed tourniquet application has a negative impact on post-operative wound healing, pain and function, whilst other publications contradict this. However, no previous studies evaluated the effect of tourniquet use on prosthesis survival and mid-term functional outcome specifically. Methods: In this longitudinal observational cohort study 115 patients (116 knees) undergoing TKA without tourniquet use were compared with 374 patients (395 knees) with a tourniquet. Prosthesis survival, revision risks and complications were analysed through chart review after a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years. Additionally, patient reported outcome measures regarding knee functionality and health status (PROMs; KOOS, OKS, EQ-5D, SF-12) were collected prospectively. Results: Both groups had an equal overall re-operation rate of 4.3% and showed similar revision rates for aseptic loosening as well as for other causes. In the tourniquet group a higher complication rate (14.7% vs 10.3%) was observed. The majority was urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization. Both groups showed comparable, improved post-operative functional results compared to the pre-operative state for all PROMs at all time points. Conclusions: In this study TKA without tourniquet use yielded similar mid-term results as TKA with tourniquet use with regard to prosthesis survival, reoperations, complications, knee functionality and health status.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.