Application of machine learning to predict tacrolimus exposure in liver and kidney transplant patients given the MeltDose formulation

Purpose: Machine Learning (ML) algorithms represent an interesting alternative to maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimators (MAP-BE) for tacrolimus AUC estimation, but it is not known if training an ML model using a lower number of full pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (="true" reference AUC)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2022-12, Vol.79, p.311-319
Hauptverfasser: Ponthier, L., Marquet, P., Moes, D.J.A.R., Rostaing, L., Hoek, B. van, Monchaud, C., Labriffe, M., Woillard, J.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Machine Learning (ML) algorithms represent an interesting alternative to maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimators (MAP-BE) for tacrolimus AUC estimation, but it is not known if training an ML model using a lower number of full pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (="true" reference AUC) provides better performances than using a larger dataset of less accurate AUC estimates. The objectives of this study were: to develop and benchmark ML algorithms trained using full PK profiles to estimate MeltDose (R)-tacrolimus individual AUCs using 2 or 3 blood concentrations; and to compare their performance to MAP-BE. Methods: Data from liver (n = 113) and kidney (n = 97) transplant recipients involved in MeltDose-tacrolimus PK studies were used for the training and evaluation of ML algorithms. "True" AUC0-24 h was calculated for each patient using the trapezoidal rule on the full PK profile. ML algorithms were trained to estimate tacrolimus true AUC using 2 or 3 blood concentrations. Performances were evaluated in 2 external sets of 16 (renal) and 48 (liver) transplant patients. Results: Best estimation performances were obtained with the MARS algorithm and the following limited sampling strategies (LSS): predose (0), 8, and 12 h post-dose (rMPE = -1.28%, rRMSE = 7.57%), or 0 and 12 h (rMPE = -1.9%, rRMSE = 10.06%). In the external dataset, the performances of the final ML algorithms based on two samples in kidney (rMPE = -3.1%, rRMSE = 11.1%) or liver transplant recipients (rMPE = -3.4%, rRMSE = 9.86%) were as good as or better than those of MAP-BEs based on three time points. Conclusion: The MARS ML models developed using "true" MeltDose (R)-tacrolimus AUCs yielded accurate individual estimations using only two blood concentrations.
DOI:10.1007/s00228-022-03445-5