Amphibious Encounters: Coral and People in Conservation Outreach in Indonesia
Drawing on long-term ethnographic research in Indonesia, this article describes a conservation outreach project that attempts to educate and convert local people into coral protectors. Both coral and the sea-dwelling Bajau people appear to be amphibious beings, moving between a changeable land-water...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engaging Science, Technology, and Society Technology, and Society, 2017, Vol.2017 (3), p.292-314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Drawing on long-term ethnographic research in Indonesia, this article describes a conservation
outreach project that attempts to educate and convert local people into coral protectors. Both
coral and the sea-dwelling Bajau people appear to be amphibious beings, moving between a
changeable land-water interface, and between different, fluidly interwoven ontological
constellations. We show that the failure of conservation organizations to recognize the
ontologically ambiguous nature of “coral” and “people” translates to a breakdown of outreach
goals. Mobilizing the concept of amphibiousness to engage this ambiguity and fluidity, we
describe the moving land-water interface as the actual living environment for both coral and
people. The notion of amphibiousness, we suggest, has practical and political value, in particular
for reconsidering outreach and how it may be reframed as a process involving ontological
dialogue. For conservation outreach to become seaworthy, it needs to cultivate an amphibious
capacity, capable of moving in-between and relating partly overflowing ways of knowing and
being. Providing room for ambiguity, thinking with amphibiousness furthermore encourages
suspension of the (Western) tendency to explain the Other, to fix what does not add up. As such,
it is of heuristic relevance for the on-going discussions of ontological multiplicity that have
proliferated at the intersection between STS and anthropology. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.17351/ests2017.59 |