Control of pH and PIP2 Gating in Heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 Channels by H-Bonding at the Helix-Bundle Crossing

Inhibition by intracellular H + (pH gating) and activation by phosphoinositides such as PIP 2 (PIP 2 gating) are key regulatory mechanisms in the physiology of inwardly-rectifying potassium (Kir) channels. Our recent findings suggest that PIP 2 gating and pH gating are controlled by an intrasubunit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Channels (Austin, Tex.) Tex.), 2007-09, Vol.1 (5), p.327-330
Hauptverfasser: Rapedius, Markus, Paynter, Jennifer J., Fowler, Philip, Shang, Lijun, Sansom, Mark, Tucker, Stephen J., Baukrowitz, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Inhibition by intracellular H + (pH gating) and activation by phosphoinositides such as PIP 2 (PIP 2 gating) are key regulatory mechanisms in the physiology of inwardly-rectifying potassium (Kir) channels. Our recent findings suggest that PIP 2 gating and pH gating are controlled by an intrasubunit H-bond at the helix-bundle crossing between a lysine in TM1 and a backbone carbonyl group in TM2. This interaction only occurs in the closed state and channel opening requires this H-bond to be broken, thereby influencing the kinetics of PIP 2 - and pH-gating in Kir channels. In this addendum, we explore the role of H-bonding in heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels. Kir5.1 subunits do not possess a TM1 lysine. However, homology modelling and molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that the TM1 lysine in Kir4.1 is capable of H-bonding at the helix-bundle crossing. Consistent with this, the rates of pH and PIP 2 gating in Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels (two H-bonds) were intermediate between those of wild-type homomeric Kir4.1 (four H-bonds) and Kir4.1(K67M) channels (no H-bonds) suggesting that the number of H-bonds in the tetrameric channel complex determines the gating kinetics. Furthermore, in heteromeric Kir4.1(K67M)/Kir5.1 channels, where the two remaining H-bonds are disrupted, we found that the gating kinetics were similar to Kir4.1(K67M) homomeric channels despite the fact that these two channels differ considerably in their PIP 2 affinities. This indicates that Kir channel PIP 2 affinity has little impact on either the PIP 2 - or pH-gating kinetics.
ISSN:1933-6950
1933-6969
DOI:10.4161/chan.5176